Infrastructure as the Cornerstone of AI: The Role of CoreWeave
To understand current developments, it is necessary to understand what CoreWeave actually does. Unlike general cloud giants like AWS or Google Cloud, which offer a wide range of services for everything from emails to databases, CoreWeave specializes exclusively in high-performance computing (HPC) and infrastructure for training large language models (LLMs).
Their main competitive advantage is the ability to orchestrate a huge number of graphics processing units (GPUs), especially top-tier chips from NVIDIA. For companies like Anthropic, which develop the Claude series models, access to thousands of interconnected GPUs with extremely low latency is a matter of survival. CoreWeave does not function as a simple server lessor, but as a specialized layer that optimizes how data moves between chips, which is critical for efficient training of models with trillions of parameters.
Anthropic and Claude: The Battle for Intellectual Supremacy
Thanks to its partnership with CoreWeave (and also with AWS), Anthropic has become one of the most significant players in the market. Their models, especially the latest versions of Claude, are often compared to OpenAI's GPT-4o or Google's Gemini 1.5 Pro in benchmark tests.
Looking at the technical comparison, we see interesting trends:
- Claude (Anthropic): Excels in nuanced text understanding, programming, and instruction following. It is often considered a "safer" model thanks to Constitutional AI technology.
- GPT-4o (OpenAI): Still leads in multimodal capabilities (voice and image response speed) and broad ecosystem integration.
- Gemini (Google): Offers the largest context window, allowing it to process extremely long documents or entire code libraries at once.
Thanks to the infrastructure provided by CoreWeave, Anthropic can scale its models as quickly as the market demands, without being limited by the capacities of general cloud services, which often suffer from a shortage of the latest GPU chips.
Practical Impact: What Does This Mean for Companies and Developers?
This shift from "software as a service" to "computing power as a service" has fundamental implications for the AI economy. For the average user, this can manifest as higher stability and faster chatbot responses. For businesses, however, it is a matter of cost and strategy.
For startups and developers: The ability to rent specialized computing power allows smaller teams to compete with giants. Instead of buying your own data centers, you can use the Compute-as-a-Service model. Prices for renting GPU clusters in 2026 range from tens to hundreds of dollars per hour depending on the chip type (e.g., NVIDIA Blackwell B200), which requires precise financial planning.
For the European and Czech market: Here we encounter an important aspect: regulation and data sovereignty. With the implementation of the EU AI Act, companies in Europe must pay attention to where data training and processing takes place. While CoreWeave is primarily an American player, its growth forces European providers (such as local data centers within the EU) to adapt quickly. For Czech companies developing their own AI applications, it is crucial to monitor whether the chosen infrastructure meets personal data protection requirements (GDPR) and whether it is available within European regions to minimize latency and legal risks.
Availability and Price: Where to Start?
If you want to try models from Anthropic, they are available through the Claude.ai platform.
- Free tier: Limited access to the latest models with a message limit.
- Claude Pro: Approximately 20 USD / month (approx. 470 CZK), which offers higher limits and priority access.
- API access: Payment based on usage (tokens), ideal for developers in the Czech Republic who integrate Claude into their applications.
Conclusion: An Investment Perspective on Infrastructure
Analysis from The Motley Fool suggests that while models like Claude or GPT may be replaced by newer and better versions over time, the need for computing power will only grow. CoreWeave thus positions itself as a "shovel seller in a gold rush." For the Czech technological scene, this means that the future success of local AI projects will depend not only on the quality of algorithms but also on the ability to effectively utilize global and local computing capacity.
Can a Czech company use CoreWeave services to train its own models?
Yes, CoreWeave offers cloud services accessible globally via API and a web interface. However, the key task for Czech companies remains ensuring compliance with EU regulations (AI Act) and verifying that data trained in the cloud meets data sovereignty requirements within the EU.
Is Claude better than ChatGPT for writing texts in Czech?
Currently (2026), both models show a very high level of Czech language proficiency. However, Claude often has an edge in the naturalness of tone and the ability to adhere to a specific style (e.g., formal vs. informal), while GPT tends to be slightly faster in generating short, factual texts.
What are the main costs when building your own AI solution?
The biggest costs are not in the code development itself, but in the cost of computing power (GPU) and the cost of data quality for training. For small companies, it is most efficient to use existing models via API (e.g., Anthropic API), instead of trying to train their own model from scratch.